Code: Select all
https://analog.com/Code: Select all
###cookie-consent-containeranalog.com
analog.com
Obtrusive cookie consent overlay on
Screenshot: https://abload.de/img/analog.comzkjp8.png
from Fanboy’s Annoyance filter list matches the dialog, but this leaves the backdrop present and the ability to scroll missing.
On uBO add
This won't be fixed in Fanboy Annoyance or uBlock Annoyances lists.
Code: Select all
analog.com##.modal-backdrop
analog.com##body.modal-open:style(overflow:auto !important)
Thanks, I had problems figuring out the second rule. I was unaware of the existence of the action operators in uBlock origin.
May I ask why? Website not important enough for the general audience? Because it is not working with simple filters? Completely understandable. But in the current state the site is completely unusable and this is not just a niche website, this is a NASDAQ 100 company. Should I report this in the forum Report incorrectly removed content or will this also not be fixed?
Sorry I completely forgotten but it's actually fixed in uBlock Annoyances. Test with the list.
Confirmed working with uBlock filters - Annoyances, this list was not enabled here for some unknown reason. Sorry for not checking this before reporting. This leaves my question if the problem caused by Fanboy’s Annoyance list (without uBlock filters - Annoyances) should be reported. I am also still confused by you statement, that this issue woul not be fixed in these lists. At least regarding uBlock filters - Annoyances it was obviously wrong. I also was unable to find any official criteria for not fixing annoyances or at least adding filter exceptions for non-niche sites broken by annoyance filters.
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets#uassets
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/pull/7701
The commit was made before this decision was formally made after their internal discussion.GDPR messages will not be addressed in uAssets.
https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uAssets/pull/7701