EasyList (24 Apr 2010 17:40 UTC):
Code: Select all
Load Time: 1632ms (Average: 163.2)
Pattern Total: 17.531 (1.7531)
Code: Select all
Load Time: 2109ms (Average: 210.9)
Pattern Total: 14.8925 (Average: 1.48925)
Code: Select all
Load Time: 1632ms (Average: 163.2)
Pattern Total: 17.531 (1.7531)
Code: Select all
Load Time: 2109ms (Average: 210.9)
Pattern Total: 14.8925 (Average: 1.48925)
Looks like the credit for the Pattern matching benchmark has to go to Wladimir as noted in the page title (have to give credit where it is due )Michael wrote:fanboy provided the following comparison of EasyList and his subscription based on his subscription benchmarking tool
Code: Select all
Time to load filters: 118ms
Average time for pattern matching: 1.7005ms (Loops: 2000)
Code: Select all
Time to load filters: 169ms
Average time for pattern matching: 7.078ms (Loops: 2000)
For testing I'll generally use chrome or opera, seems using Firefox the numbers vary more. Never used IE thoughHubird wrote:Yes, I just had a play around. I noticed the variance too. I found IE was useless for running it as it kept complaining about script errors (taking too long to respond). Minefield complained about non-responsive scripts too but allows you to easily ignore the warning. I ended up using SRWare Iron which seemed to do the trick.
I was under the same impression. I remember there was a different test floating around a while back which seemed to focus more on hiding rules (site does not work any more).fanboy wrote:The benchmark tool is really mainly useful for filters rather than elements fyi
without elements for my list also?chrome://mochikit/content/tests/performance/filter_fromText.html
EasyList: 107.7 ms +/- 3.6 ms
EasyList without element hiding: 50.1 ms +/- 1.3 ms
Fanboy's List: 127.1 ms +/- 2.7 ms
Code: Select all
153K 2010-05-17 17:40 easylist.txt
179K 2010-05-17 22:53 fanboy-adblocklist-current-expanded.txt
Now available with out elements,Wladimir Palant wrote:I only copied the file contents as they are available on the web already - I'm not aware of any variant of your list without element hiding.