EasyList Forum

Awesome!!

Ares2 wrote:

Gnintendo wrote:More topics means a better Easylist for us all.

I agree but atm, Rick has already enough topics to do.

I agree with Ares2, and it can get to a point of counter productive if it's to much.

Great read, I hadn't seen that Hyperwords before, looks interesting.

Priceless ?? lol couldn't resist.

confirmed.. interesting info, it worked fine so I updated my filters just to see if it's something new that has it broke again and sure enough it stopped working after update. Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2a1pre) Gecko/20081228 Minefield/3.2a1pre ID:20081228033648 ABP dev 1...

I don't like ice storms, but they are very beautiful I most confess.

Thanks, that works for me Rick.

Missing some ads on multichannel. I don't know if this site is big enough for filters in easylist, but I've seen it several times on sites like digg/dlsreports. Here is a direct link a page with an ad and a missed div with empty box. http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6617245.html?industryid=4719...

Ok, Thank you very much man. I'll let you know if I see any FP's with it.

Edit: posted replies with no issues. Thanks again!

fair enough, can you or someone else post a good rule that I can USE for the time being? Thanks.

Ok, they are working on a new theme for the forums to match the front page. It's called Finity. There is a box at the top that is now missed. And Rick the filter you suggested above doesn't catch it either I tried it. You can change the theme at the bottom of the page in forums. FYI is all. It's a b...

I agree with Ares2, that did seem to have it fixed. The reply worked..and the boxes was gone. Not that it matters much to me if both work correctly.

Looks good here, just wanted to confirm since I complained. Good work!

##div[style^="background: rgb(255, 255, 255) none repeat scroll 0% 0%;"] blocks the box in forums for posting a reply.

Wow! If that doesn't make people stop to think, nothing will. great post!!

Just an honest question about whitelisting whole domains like .edu and .gov. Wouldn't this whitelist also affect the new malware list that just got started? I know most of those domains are good, but there has been a few times someone used them for malware iirc. Just a thought I had, please feel fre...

rick752 wrote:What? Getting younger?

Oh, you are the sly one, aren't you.

LOL Happy B-day Rick. Don't feel so bad, I think it (getting older) sure beats the alternative.

PS have you seen this Techdirt article? They are heavily defending you and Adblock Plus and it makes a good point.

I thought I would post I added this story to FoxieWire.com it's a digg like site for Mozilla news and stuff. Check it out..maybe vote for it.

LOL.. no offense this just gave me a chuckle.

jack123 wrote: Does this mean it works only with that browser, and NOT with Internet Explorer (7.0)??

jack123

That is correct it only works with Mozilla products, but not sure it works well in all of them. It's designed for Firefox. I know for sure it does NOT work in IE.

That was a good read, and I see what you mean about the pro advertising slant, but I think they did a pretty good job of being at least partially neutral. I mean you can tell which side they are on, but at the same time they did post what your responses was and allowed your side of the story as to w...

My wife works for the PO (my Mom did also the whole time I was growing up.. retired a few years ago) and I can say without a doubt, nothing the PO does makes any sense.

I agree with Lanik, I hated or at least disliked it at first, but now I think it's really a great feature.

rick752 wrote: When I go there, it resoves to "https://www.bankofamerica.com/index.jsp".
Is it a "logged on" thing?

Same here..so maybe you live elsewhere and it's treating you differently? Or does it treat you different because you have a small business account?

I'm not seeing that here.

I was unaware that they (Mozilla) was using the list from stopbadware.org, I thought it was Google only. Good to know.

It was down for me last nite, but it's working as of now, for me.

Except in Firefox 3 (beta x), right? Or has that been fixed now?