EasyList Forum

Werbung im Postfach bei web.de
Screenshot: https://vgy.me/WCEKbm.png

Alexa Global Traffic Rank for spankwire.com: 1,600

Seems like this should be added.

Popunder when clicking on a video not being blocked.

Stimmt. Ist über Nacht verschwunden.

True. I also found that adding ##[href^="http://r.search.yahoo.com/cbclk/"] removes these types of Yahoo search ads while preserving legit results since /cbclk/ seems to only be used for text ads. The rest (blank box) probably needs to be removed on a per site basis though. searchguide.lev...

New popunder scripts
URL: http://www.spankwire.com/

Adblock message
URL: http://www.digitalcitizen.life/best-too ... re-updates
https://vgy.me/gb8ke3.png

I don't know if that would be possible with a filter. I use YAYS which is great: https://eugenox.appspot.com/script/yays

0180.info ist im Grunde die selbe Seite. Roter Hintergrund wie bei teltarif.de und Vodafone Banner.
0180.info: https://i.imgur.com/FvsDhB4.png
teltarif.de: https://i.imgur.com/dtYxYJv.png

URL: http://the-parallax.com/2015/12/30/new- ... future-qa/
I've seen this on a couple of websites now.

Some websites can live without the script, some can't. MIT Bootcamp should be unblocked though.

URL: https://patientsequipment.com/ Annoying age verification which is also used for ads: ||ageverify.co^$third-party Static banners: ||ilgm-deals.com^$third-party ||vapornation.com/media/affiliateplus^$third-party patientsequipment.com###wysiwyg_widgets_widget-5 patientsequipment.com###wysiwyg_widg...

Thanks.
Another one from the GitHub issue I linked: http://bootcamp.mit.edu/
I suggest to unbreak all websites using this(?)

They added a new method.
Example: http://pornve.com/rdzl403teeii/Sensual_Moments_5_2015.html

Yes. Sorry, somehow I missed that. Thank you, guys.

That works for the popunder. The ad frame from that domain is not blocked though. This should work for that frame:

They seem to replace the domain for the popunders quite often. They first load a script from that domain which loads an SWF object which opens a popunder when the user clicks on the video. Example: http://allmyvideos.net/embed-8bg6j429nh66.html Domain today: theodosium.com Should I open a new topic ...

Works like a charm. Thank you.

Example:
http://www.alluc.ee/l/I-Now-Pronounce-Y ... lv/k98ao99
http://www.alluc.ee/stream/daffy duck

EasyPrivacy breaks sites using AngularJS.
Example: http://www.windward.eu/
Also: https://github.com/chrisaljoudi/uBlock/issues/1585
Problematic filter:

You could use QuickJava to easily toggle flash.

elypter wrote:are there addons that allow the detection of the flash plugin site wise?

What do you mean? Any website can detect whether you have flash or not.

URLs:
http://oss.informaction.com/
http://software.informaction.com/

An ad just like the one on noscript.net

Why do they say right on their site that it's a tracker? Well, let it be then.

Yes, but I don't understand why a web dev wouldn't use ABP. They also use SEO tools or otherwise they would get screwed by Google & Co. ABP has such a large user base that it should be standard for every web dev too.

Just install ABP and see if it breaks something on your site. If yes adjust accordingly. I don't get what's so hard about that.
Millions of users are happy with the extension and they shouldn't change it just for your site.

Example: http://anti-hacker-alliance.com/index.p ... 30.252.129
They load the IP you looked up as a frame which can be highly problematic and is at least a privacy threat.
Is this a case for EasyPrivacy? Or where could this fit?

http://tags.tiqcdn.com/utag/avisbudgetgroup/avisfr/prod/utag.js Is there a reason why this is not blocked by EasyPrivacy? It's web analytics as far as I can see. I don't see it doing anything meaningful to the site. Quotes from their website: "A tag is a piece of JavaScript code that most digi...

A huge thanks from me too.
Can't let those guys get away with exploiting stuff like that. Especially since they have tried for years to take away our freedom to control which servers we connect to and which code we run on our devices.

Now I understand why Gorhill always encourages to use as few whitelist filters as somehow possible. Well, I guess the actual reason is privacy exposure.
Could you guys implement a fix as quick as possible so the scum...err...nice people from PHN don't make too much money off of this?