I was looking around Firefox add-ons when I came across this add-on:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/8265
It's called np7esk32 and allows ActiveX in Firefox 3.0. It's still an "experimental add-on" but it's being actively developed.
I'm probably not going to install it yet, but it's definitely going to be something I'll be looking back at.
I definitely think it's about time somebody started working on this again .
Well, that's my find of the day...
~Gnintendo
np7esk32 ~ ActiveX in Firefox 3
Personally the main reason I don't use IE is hActiveX. IMO installing in FireFox would be counter productive.
"If it ain't broke don't fix it."
It's just good that somebody is working on it because there are a lot of LEGIT reasons to have ActiveX and there are a lot of times you wish you could just enable it really quick for one thing and now there's finally going to be something again that will let you do just that.
I've never needed to. And if I did IETab usually takes care of that problem.
"If it ain't broke don't fix it."
Except for Microsoft itself (ex: Windows Update in XP) I can't name any legit site that uses it without an alternative (Java for the most part).Gnintendo wrote:there are a lot of LEGIT reasons to have ActiveX
Microsoft is a good example, there are some driver update websites that use it too...it's just good to be able to enable it.
makes me a bit nervous to have activex in my everyday browser in the form of non-official extension. i prefer to explicitly load up IE any time i need to run an activex control. which, now a days, only consists of stuff right off microsoft's site like windows update. i suppose it wouldn't be so bad as long as i could disable and re-enable it without having to restart firefox.
heck i wish i had the patience to run noscript. i tried installing it, but got irritated at having to manually enable scripts for 75% of the pages on the internet. that didn't last long, i decided to deal with the small risk
heck i wish i had the patience to run noscript. i tried installing it, but got irritated at having to manually enable scripts for 75% of the pages on the internet. that didn't last long, i decided to deal with the small risk
I share many of the same thoughts with you, which is why I'm glad it can be disabled and re-enabled. Just enable/disable from firefox Add-ons plugins tab.jade wrote:makes me a bit nervous to have activex in my everyday browser in the form of non-official extension. i prefer to explicitly load up IE any time i need to run an activex control. which, now a days, only consists of stuff right off microsoft's site like windows update. i suppose it wouldn't be so bad as long as i could disable and re-enable it without having to restart firefox.
heck i wish i had the patience to run noscript. i tried installing it, but got irritated at having to manually enable scripts for 75% of the pages on the internet. that didn't last long, i decided to deal with the small risk
- Adblock Plus Fan
- Contributor
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 6:27 am
Noscript is actually perfectly fine if you know how to set it up to your liking. Latest version practically has 3 modes:jade wrote:heck i wish i had the patience to run noscript. i tried installing it, but got irritated at having to manually enable scripts for 75% of the pages on the internet. that didn't last long, i decided to deal with the small risk
1st mode is the default one, the one that annoyed you.
2nd mode is one which automatically allows all 1st party scripts and only blocks 3rd party scripts which are not in your whitelist. (I use this one)
3rd mode allows all scripts except for those that you manually put into the Untrusted list. (Essentially does everything Yesscript does, but is more flexible for blocking particular servers)
Fan
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:27 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
That's the Allow Scripts Globally mode, which continues to provide Anti-XSS protection. (YesScript doesn't.)Adblock Plus Fan wrote:3rd mode allows all scripts except for those that you manually put into the Untrusted list. (Essentially does everything Yesscript does, but is more flexible for blocking particular servers)
From http://noscript.net/faq#qa2_3:
And http://noscript.net/features#xss:If you just prefer to restore Firefox's default (less safe) behavior of allowing JavaScript and plugins by default, but you'd like to retain Anti-XSS protection and the ability to selectively blacklist sites, you can just click the NoScript icon and select "Allow Scripts Globally (dangerous)" command.
Furthermore, NoScript checks also requests started from whitelisted origins for specific suspicious URL patterns landing on other trusted sites: if a potential XSS attack is detected, even if coming from a trusted source, filters are promptly triggered.
- Adblock Plus Fan
- Contributor
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 6:27 am
Yeah, it's one of the many other good features in noscript, my favourite which I use often is plug-in control for Java and Quicktime/Realmedia, those are awesome because they are hidden behind collapsible placeholders and need your permission to start.Alan Baxter wrote:That's the Allow Scripts Globally mode, which continues to provide Anti-XSS protection. (YesScript doesn't.)
And seeing the numerous bugs and vulnerabilities for Adobe's flash plug-in, I was tempted to use noscript's placeholder for Flash as well. But it's unfortunate that noscript puts up placeholders for items which would have been blocked by ABP to begin with, meaning lots unnecessary placeholders every time you have flash ads. Noscript would have been better if it only offered placeholders for the remaining relevant Flash objects that has gone through ABP's filtering. So since the Flash placeholder doesn't play nicely with ABP, I've opted not to use it.
That one is high on my wish list, but noscript is a great extension already even without Flash placeholder. As far as I can remember, I think Wladimir once talked about placeholder functionality for Flash in the future, once he resolved some issues that allows you to load/unload objects, this one is probably somewhere at the top of my wish list, can't wait for it to happen
Fan
-
- Contributor
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:27 am
- Location: Colorado, USA
I see what you mean, although I've never been irritated by that. I kind of like seeing all those placeholders for flash.Adblock Plus Fan wrote:But it's unfortunate that noscript puts up placeholders for items which would have been blocked by ABP to begin with, meaning lots unnecessary placeholders every time you have flash ads. Noscript would have been better if it only offered placeholders for the remaining relevant Flash objects that has gone through ABP's filtering. So since the Flash placeholder doesn't play nicely with ABP, I've opted not to use it.
I'm eking by with an eight year old pc, and flash usually slow it down too much.